Showing posts with label health career. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health career. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

OERU / OERF / UNESCO Press release: Towards an OER university - Free learning for all students worldwide

Please circulate: Joint OER Foundation / UNESCO press release.
The Open Education Resource (OER) Foundation is to host a strategic international meeting in Dunedin on 23 February, to commence planning for the provision of free learning to all students worldwide. Support from the United Nations Science and Education Organisation (UNESCO) to stream the meeting on the internet will allow the participation of education leaders and interested persons from around the globe.
Join the meeting as a virtual participant and help make OER futures happen.

Read more.


(If you blog about this important meeting -- please use the #OERU tag).

2011 will be a quantum shift year for the mainstream adoption of OER.

Cheers
Wayne
Wayne Mackintosh , Ph.D.
Director OER Foundation
Director, International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Founder and elected Community Council Member, Wikieducator
Skype: WGMNZ1
identi.ca

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OER university" group.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/oer-university?hl=en?hl=en
Visit the OER university page on http://wikieducator.org/OER_university

Friday, December 3, 2010

h2cm and clinical equipoise

The past few weeks reading the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice - I've encountered the concept of equipoise: specifically the clinical form.

The Health Career - Care Domains - Model is all about 'poise'.

The model's care domains provides the perfect workout.

Medicine, health and social care constantly exercises us. We are whether or not we recognize it on a balance board. In fact if you consider that image and then factor in the complexity of health care today you realise just how much stuff (technology), how many people (subjects, agents) need to be on that same board. Who does the board belong to though? Well of course it's -

Jo (off-balance, strengths depleted, sick (and tired), prone to relapse, bank poleaxed...) Public's !

The April 2010 issue of the above journal is a fascinating read. I noticed today that some of our placement students were not aware of the recent and current position regarding health policy: that is the 'long view' of decades such as: Health of the Nation, the National Service Frameworks, Darzi ... They need to address that and I'm sure they will.

This journal issue prompts me to consider evidence based medicine anew, especially:
  • How long it's been around - some 20 years.
  • Its occupying the SCIENCES domain, with its weight threatening to overbalance all (you could say it's a significant singularity).
  • The realization that the Emperor is short on clothes.
  • Given the above it can mature. Bogdan-Lovis and Holmes-Rovner (2010)
Back to that board: and stepping onto the health care domains - all four of them so spread your feet - you can see instantly (feel that feedback) how EBM, shared decision making and (person) patient-centered care are all related. As Bogdan-Lovis and Holmes-Rovner (2010) highlight:
Equipoise is the heart of the shared decision making movement, and it embodies the problems for which patient decision aids are most often developed to explain the risks and benefits of competing alternatives. p.377.
h2cm is well suited to this task on so many levels.

The past week or two I've also noticed several mentions of the need to nudge people - here and there - both in the media and in Bogdan-Lovis and Holmes-Rovner's paper and references.

More to follow - and as you step-off take care ....

Wilson, K. (2010) Evidence-based medicine. The good the bad and the ugly. A clinician's perspective. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 398-400.
Bogdan-Lovis, E., Holmes-Rovner, M. (2010) Prudent evidence-fettered shared decision making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 376-381.

And for the week ahead:
One mind, many minds - ONE PLANET. One need, many needs - ONE PLANET: what price stability?
http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/2009/02/one-mind-many-minds-one-planet-one-need.html

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Call for Proposals to Phase 3 Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW)

Last month I posted the advanced notice about this call for proposals, which is now fully released and has been publicised on the SPARC / KT-EQUAL network:

Dear All (but especially researchers who are desperate to secure research funding)

The Call for Proposals to Phase 3 of the cross-research council multi-health agency Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW) initiative was released today.

Details can be found at:

http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Fundingopportunities/Calls/LLHWPhase3/MRC006680

This is a very significant opportunity, well worth close scrutiny and consideration and, hopefully, subsequent action.

If you have any uncertainties about the programme or its requirements then I am sure that the representatives of the research councils will be very pleased for you to make contact with them.

Importantly this is a call for multidisciplinary research, a requirement which must be wholeheartedly embraced for any proposal to stand a chance of being eligible for consideration.

It's time for action!!

Best wishes

Peter Lansley
Professor Peter Lansley, BSc, MSc, PhD, MCIOB, FCOT
Director, KT-EQUAL – Knowledge Transfer for Extending Quality Life
School of Construction Management and Engineering, URS Building,
University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 219, Reading, RG6 6AW, UK
p.r.lansley at reading.ac.uk
http://www.sparc.ac.uk

Friday, May 14, 2010

Health, social care and personal map making

Vermeeer painting


There have been two series running on BBC 4 in the UK over recent months and currently with a cartographic and historical focus:

see - The Beauty of Maps

This Vermeer - The Art of Painting - was featured in one programme and reveals the power and status of maps as Wikipedia also explains.

It is natural to see the health career model as a map, but this map is not just the preserve of the wealthy. Hodges' model can be used universally by all - a common framework.


Use of the term map and its synonyms is in turn common in medicine in many forms:


The above sites reveal how maps, charts and atlases relate the individual, geography and health.

In addition to its geographic connotation projection also has a psychological meaning. Hodges' model provides a substrate* on which to project personalised, national and global health.

An individual; a people; a nation: for each a journey .... and for each a map ....

Image source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Painting_%28Vermeer%29


* You have to love that floor ;-)

Sunday, May 9, 2010

International Journal of User Driven Healthcare (IJUDH) CfP

Dear Mr. Jones

In view of your work in patient-centered care, I’d like to invite you and/or your colleagues to submit a paper to this Special Issue of the new journal described further below and via the web link provided. I think our global readers would be very interested in your thoughts (and projects) on innovative ways to get relevant healthcare information into the hands of ‘users’ (both patients and providers), within the user-driven EBM paradigm, per below.

Please also share this call for papers with your colleagues.

Thanks for your consideration,

Susan Ross, MD


International Journal of User Driven Healthcare (IJUDH) Call for Papers

Editor-in-Chief:
Rakesh Biswas,
Center for Scientific Research and Development (CSRD),
PCMS Campus, India

Published: Quarterly

Call for Papers - Special Issue:

Submission Due Date: July 1, 2010
Special Issue On User Driven Healthcare and Evidence-based Medicine


Guest Editors:
Susan Ross, MD, FRCPC


Introduction

User Driven Healthcare (UDH) is part consumer-driven healthcare, part narrative medicine, and part Health 2.0. It stems from a concept of participatory healthcare whereby all stakeholders, enabled by information, software, and cyber-community, focus on healthcare value. But where does Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) fit into this framework? It is sometimes forgotten that EBM is a three-legged stool, comprised of the triad of evidence +provider expertise + patient preferences. In this EBM framework, provider expertise is needed to bridge the inferential gap between population-based evidence and the individual patient. And each patient's values and preferences should narrow that inferential gap further. But since the introduction of EBM nearly two decades ago, the primary focus of EBM proponents has been on Evidence, at the expense of patient preferences and provider expertise. Perhaps this is why the promise of EBM to foster the most efficient and high quality healthcare has not yet been realized.

Objective of the Special Issue

This Special Issue will focus on the following questions: Is the recent emergence of User Driven Healthcare really a new, post-EBM paradigm for healthcare, or just an overdue consideration of the other two legs of the original EBM stool? How might this trend affect all stakeholders?

Recommended Topics

Topics to be discussed in this special issue include (but are not limited to) the following:
  • Developing valid patient-level evidence using the Web
  • Evidence generation—clinical research strategies using social media and mobile technologies
  • Examples of UDH to a) help formulate the right questions to ask in EBM; b) develop answers to those questions; c) disseminate the answers to patients and providers with a need to know; and d) test the impact of UDH-generated Evidence on patient outcomes
  • Helping online patients sift the ‘wheat’ from the ‘chaff’—information management for patients in an EBM world
  • How to incorporate patient preferences and values into ambulatory care decision-making (i.e., into the 10 minute visit)
  • Measuring the impact of UDH on patient outcomes
  • Patient-level decisions vs. population-level evidence (bridging the inferential gap)
  • Pharmaceutical communication strategies using social media—impact on healthcare quality and costs in an EBM framework
  • Place of social media in EBM—patient and physician online communities
  • Practice of UDH vs. EBM around the world
  • Regulatory issues of evidence dissemination by industry using social media in healthcare Statistical and other evaluative methods to assess the validity and reliability of evidence developed using social media and mobile technologies
  • Trends in N-of-1 studies, and their relevance to EBM and UDH
  • Use of collective intelligence to solve healthcare problems for individuals and communities
Submission

Researchers and practitioners are invited to submit papers for this special theme issue on User Driven Healthcare and Evidence-based Medicine on or before July 1, 2010. Submissions received after this date will be reviewed for possible publication in subsequent issues of the journal. All submissions must be original and may not be under review by another publication. INTERESTED AUTHORS SHOULD CONSULT THE JOURNAL’S GUIDELINES FOR MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSIONS at http://www.igi-global.com/development/author_info/guide.asp. All submitted papers will be reviewed on a double-blind, peer review basis. Papers must follow APA style for reference citations.

All submissions and inquiries should be directed to the attention of:

Susan Ross, MD
Guest Editor
Email:sdross720@gmail.com

Thursday, April 22, 2010

A call for applications for the 3rd phase of Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW)


Advanced Notice

A call for applications for the third phase of Lifelong Health and Wellbeing (LLHW) will be announced in early May 2010.

Lifelong Health and Wellbeing is a major cross-council initiative involving AHRC, BBSRC, EPSRC, ESRC and MRC in partnership with the UK health departments. LLHW supports multi-disciplinary research addressing factors across the life course that influence healthy ageing and wellbeing in later life.

The initiative aims to lead to improvements in health and quality of life in later life, inform policy and practice and increase capacity building in ageing related research.

Phase 3 will invite high-quality innovative multidisciplinary applications that focus on major ageing-related challenges faced by the UK in the 21st century. Proposals will be welcome from multidisciplinary teams in the areas of, but not restricted to the following:
  • Mental Health and Wellbeing including quality of life, preserving cognitive function and exploiting mental capital
  • Resilience for successful ageing: from cell to society including life course influences, markers for ageing and processes of ageing
  • Age-related conditions, including frailty and interventions to promote independence in later life.
Structure of the call
Funds will be available through two modes of support:

LLHW Research Grants - up to £10m will be available for multi-disciplinary research awards from £300k up to £2.5m over three to five years.

LLHW Pilot Studies - a total of £2.5m to fund up to 10 pilot or feasibility studies for a maximum of two years, aimed at informing the development of future cross-disciplinary research proposals.

Selection Criteria
Successful proposals will be of strategic importance, be truly multi-disciplinary, encompassing the remits of more than one Research Council, and have clearly articulated and robust methodology and design.

Further information
Updates and further information about phase 3 can be found on the website:
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/LLHW or by emailing llhw AT headoffice.mrc.ac.uk

My source:
Charlotte Jones
NDA Programme Secretary
The University of Sheffield
Department of Sociological Studies
Elmfield, Northumberland Road
Sheffield, S10 2TU, UK

http://www.newdynamics.group.shef.ac.uk

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Distorted care

Some musical performances are so polished, clear and (p)honed that we readily attribute them to the classical genre. There are experimental pieces that 'buck this quality trend' but the musicianship, melody and composition stand the test of time grabbing audiences by the ear, throat and heart. On the popular music front some bands - The Eagles spring to mind - are not universally appreciated for their sound, (sales), shine and harmonies.

Whatever the music though if you ramp up the volume enough - distortion happens. This disturbs and disrupts the artist's, composer's and producer's original intent.

The worry is that care can be similarly distorted, not only by those who can shout the loudest creating noise, but the political clamour that creates its own form of cultural background radiation. It becomes hard for everyone to listen and reflect on the track we've heard so many times since our teen years:
you know the one - 'Quality Care' by 'Informed Debate, Health & Social Lookyafters'.

Image my source: Sodahead.com


Additional link - BBC: Compulsory social care bill plan

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Squaring circles: Compressed patient care pathways = rich(er) patient experiences?

The use of Lean and Six-Sigma, their combination and other service improvement approaches has resulted in much more effective patient care pathways. A shining example is that of diagnostic medicine and subsequent out-patient appointments, apparently patients can attend for diagnostic services such as imaging and on the same day also attend for their first out-patient appointment. This saves time for all, with expensive imaging technology also proving its worth and RoI by working from 0700-2200.

Trust Boards are well pleased with such progress, but there is no such thing as a free lunch. Managers and execs know the lunch (diagnostics and imaging) isn't free, but quantitative aspects aside what does does this mean in terms of quality and assurance? Quality in the sense of:
  • patient (and carer) experience;
  • staff capacity to find and take advantage of patient learning (self-care, patient health career management) opportunities;
  • assessment and evaluation of patient (carer) comprehension;
There is a circle to be closed by relating quality to quantitative aspects; such as, re-referral rates, re-admission, medication / treatment concordance, plus the infusion of intelligence from local and national patient related outcome measures [PROMS] to new patient journeys.

In information science there is the concept of information compression, taking out the redundancy - repetitive data in an image or text to save on processing, transmission, and storage. As Lean Six Sigma assists teams to remove tasks, processes that do not 'add value' then the result is a richer experience. The patient journey has in this sense been compressed. The patient has fewer hospital and clinic visits with fewer bus, taxi journeys, or they pay less in car park fees. Health personnel and specialists are primed to help and deliver services that really count.

What does this compressed - 'denser' experience - mean though? Does it mean that:
  • patient's are exposed to more information (2-3 significant interviews / leaflets / instructions)?
  • there is less time available for education, health promotion, info Px giving?
- or alternately:
  • does this 'value packed' patient journey help by providing rapidly successive hooks - experiential threads to integrate patient (carer and staff!) learning?
It will be interesting to see answers to these questions and how extensive the scope of benefits are of these patient experiences across different care contexts.

Is there an optimal number for 'clinical encounters' before things start to go awry?

PROMS are quite specific (as they need to be initially), but amid richer and varied patient journeys there will be a need for other (national and local) measures.
What about the extent and level of 'care complexity' and 'holistic care'?

Additional links:

Lesley Wright on lean thinking and respecting NHS staff, HSJ, Dec 2008.

NHS ready for PROM date. NDS News Distribution Service.

Image source: http://www.navyenterprise.navy.mil/knowledge/tools/sixsigma.aspx

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Oh dear! I forgot to ask the nurse (doctor)....

Hodges' model introduction II:

The view from the other side of the fence


Have you ever been to see the doctor or nurse and shortly after leaving the surgery, or clinic you've remembered something? These days - very sadly - many people go to the doctor to seek help for their memory, but for others this is a fact of that frustrating mix of vital questions and issues to raise amid recognition that the time of nurses and doctors is very precious.

This post introduces a framework that can help people to prepare for a consultation and maintain a record of just where their care situation is up to. The framework in question is called Hodges' model. It is named after a retired Senior Lecturer called Brian Hodges who lives in Sheffield, England. Brian Hodges created the model to help nurses and community staff ensure the care they deliver is holistic. Holistic in this sense means covering all the essential aspects that contribute to health and well-being, so that includes physical, emotional and mental and even spiritual health.

If you need to go into hospital you do not want to be treated like a faulty machine. Of course, in an emergency those machine-like things we do like heart beat, respiration, temperature regulation are of central importance. Should you ever need emotional care for a severe mental health problem then you would also expect that your physical needs are taken fully into account. Amidst these aspects of care the health care team must also pay attention to culture, equality, diversity and access to services.

Although the model was developed in the 1980s its relevance and potential increases in all the time. This is because of the following:

* health care and medicine is increasingly complex;
* people may have long term and multiple chronic problems;
* education is essential to 21st century care management - as people are expected to 'self-care';
- people may also be managing their own care budget and so need information and 360 vision;
* policy makers stress the need for 'patient choice';
* high quality health and social care is very expensive;
* as people live longer and may have several relationships spanning cultures and belief systems the notion of a health career is the career.

Hodges' model builds on two basic facts of life (and death):

From your point of view and that of any health or social care professional your health is about you - an INDIVIDUAL.

Your health affects other people - most significantly your family. Rather than you being ill, you may of course be a carer having to look after a relative. Also affected are work colleagues, the wider community through to whole GROUPS of people.

We now talk about medicine, well-being, and health in terms of global health since the population of Earth is so tightly linked and interdependent.

In order to maintain health there is a need to diagnose and intervene - or assess, plan, intervene and evaluate. Here the model can also take into account ethnic and transcultural aspects of health. Diagnosis and intervention in Western medicine is frequently MECHANISTIC and this is balanced (remember that HOLISTIC part of the model) by the need for HUMANISTIC interventions. This is what we mean by 'bedside manner' and people being 'caring'. The ability to empathise with others and develop a therapeutic rapport after physical and emotional trauma is a great gift - that while often innate can also be learned and honed.

Once Brian Hodges had identified the following dimensions of care:

INDIVIDUAL - GROUP and HUMANISTIC - MECHANISTIC

he considered the types of knowledge that health and social care workers need to not only do their job safely, effeciently and effectively, but also help people to help themselves. This led to the FOUR CARE or KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS, each covers a key aspect of care:

SCIENCES: e.g. anatomy, physiology,healing process, drugs, risk, diagnosis...

INTRAPERSONAL: e.g. mood, thinking, beliefs, communication, education, learning, coping...

SOCIOLOGY: e.g. relationships, roles, meaning, groups, resources

POLITICAL: e.g. choice, consent, autonomy, policy, legislation, finances

Students - young and mature - who decide to study health and social care can use the model to help them reflect on critical events in their training and learning. The model can help them gain some insights in completing essays and case studies integrating knowledge and experience. When you think about it: if it essential that care professionals are able to have an effective dialogue with patients and the public then they should also be capable of having an effective 'dialogue' with themselves.

Members of the public can also be taught the model to help them appreciate the factors involved in their care programs, solutions and ongoing management if required. Hopefully this brief explanation sheds some light on the model's mantra:

Hodges' Health Career (Care Domains) Model: h2cm
h2cm: help 2C more - help 2 listen - help 2 care

Hodges' model is no universal panacea it is just a tool; but while services stress the need for person-centered, integrated, value-for-money, high quality services ... built on respect, dignity, trust and choice - YOUR health career matters.

h2cm can help pull the many threads together....

<>

On the website's homepage there are four introductions based upon the care domains. Each one addresses a particular audience: learners (SCIENCES); patient (INTRAPERSONAL); carer (SOCIOLOGY) and policy maker / manager (POLITICAL). They all need updating (re-writing?!).

If you would like to contribute to this exercise please contact me through twitter or at h2cmng at yahoo.co.uk

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

The 'Health Career' - records and symmetry breaking: Admin vs Clinical needs?

In my nursing career to date and over the past 18 months I've been involved in some complex clinical cases involving quite profound physical, mental and social aspects of care.

Such complexity given the rise of long-term chronic medical conditions, multiple diagnoses and an ageing population is not uncommon. What is more remarkable is simultaneously reading on the records management and other informatics mail lists questions regarding the retention of specific types records within health care, social care, schools and the human resource departments of other organisational settings.

From the perspective of Hodges' model and the notion of a health career you wonder about the efficiency of administration - and legislation - versus the potential future utility of 'archived' clinical records. Clinical records from 20 years ago and less have frequently been destroyed and you are left to consider the possible relevance of that information to the care delivered in the here and now? This is particularly acute for reasons of the following:
  • the increase in dementia and an individual's capacity to account for their past care;
  • the increase in fractured family histories;
  • the likelihood of significant past care episodes and medical events relevant to future episodes: 1) cancers; 2) psychological problems; 3) negative life experiences;
  • the use of the medical record (health career) to inform someone's life story (and not just as a 'therapeutic intervention').
Is there an argument for a re-appraisal of retention schedules? Factors to consider might include:
  • the shift to digital collection, storage, archiving and ever improving retrieval technologies;
  • the use of semantic search - and intelligent (context - discipline-based) applications;
  • the ability of the individual to decide on the longevity of their records;
  • the advice of specific patient groups - Alzheimer's; Multiple Sclerosis; HIV / Aids...;
  • the transition of an individual record to an item of historical interest;
  • the ongoing emphasis upon collaborative care, self-care and personal health records;
  • Archiving - shift from paper-centric to inclusion of digital media?
What do you think?

Additional links:

DoH Records Management - Information Policy

DoH (2006) Records management: NHS code of practice

CIPD: Retention of personnel and other related records

Personal Health Record

MyPHR

Hodges' model: POLITICAL domain links

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Road safety vs Patient safety

For effective road and rail safety the advice is....

Sometimes though looking "both ways" isn't good enough...


In health and social care and other situations in
addition to utilising holistic frameworks like Hodges' model,

we also need to look inside and outside of ourselves
- the 5th 'spiritual' domain.

Have a safe and happy 2009!!

Acknowledgement:
Photo used with permission (and thanks): Portland Ground

Crossroads sign from commons.wikimedia.org.

Friday, November 28, 2008

The Gretta Foundation - Increasing the Global Nurseforce

I was asked recently if I could assist a nurse in Tanzania regards training in the UK. As ever things are not straight forward in terms of funding and opportunities for overseas students. Several UK university schools did kindly respond with information about the current situation. Not unrelated then, I noticed this announcement on the GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery) list:

I wanted to distribute the link to the Gretta Foundation to the GANM membership.

As you all know, one of the biggest requests that we get in the GANM are those that involve education. This includes not only requests for online continuing education, but also opportunities for nurses to obtain advanced nursing degrees without leaving their countries, their families and their communities.

Gretta StylesI came across this today on the web and I forward on to all of you. The Gretta Foundation (named after Gretta Styles) has - as its mission -
"Our mission is to increase the global “Nurseforce” by providing full nursing scholarships to impoverished persons living in disease-burdened nations.

Nursing scholarship recipients, or Gretta Scholars, attend in-country nursing programs. In repayment for the scholarship assistance, graduating scholars serve for a predetermined period of time in their country’s clinics and hospitals."
For more information, visit: http://grettafoundation.org/index.html

Visit the web site

The email is intended only for the recipients. The owners of the Knowledge Gateway cannot be held responsible for the contents of the email message.

My source: GANM - Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery list; images from Gretta Foundation.