Relative poverty (3) - sciences

[The introduction is repeated across these posts: intrapersonal, political, sociology]

There are many paradoxes in life and many of these are concentrated in the realm of health and medicine (a major sub-division of life and death).

For decades the link between poverty and standards and quality of health has been recognised and politicised in the media and policy. Just this past week was news of a Bill to make the eradication of child poverty a legal obligation not something that can be the political objective at the start of a Government and then cast aside.

Many things are relative and poverty is often described in this way applying to individuals, social classes, communities, regions and whole nations. Using the domains of Hodges' model what reflections does this prompt? Let us see:

SCIENCES: We tend to think of economics and the definition of poverty in materialistic and monetary terms. In this domain things become things. Processes and much more besides - people are objectified and commodified: prostitution, child labour, child soldiers, people trafficking - individuals as numbers at a certain time, certain place. The person reduced to a process - service.

On the sciences front in an explicit way our poverty of knowledge ('education, education, education') becomes apparent as we try to place value on the environment and not only our personal use, but national use of the green and blue. A new economics is indeed called for.

In the current 2009 Reith Lectures (closing lecture this week) Professor Michael Sandel presents A New Citizenship. Within these lectures Prof Sandel explains how fees change services, values and expectations with examples of child care and blood supply in health care. Organisations have to be aware of their assets with laptops, PCs and umpteen other pieces of equipment and resource possessed of their own unique ID.

Yes, according to my interpretation of Hodges' model the points raised here belong in the political domain, and yet we are so befuddled, intoxicated and to a certain extent deluded with the sciences, technology and material things (de-vices?) that in contemplating poverty we must extend the political realm. ...

From now on the public's attitude to science as individuals and families, communities and nations is going to be critical to change our understanding and more importantly our experience of poverty - material, relative or otherwise.

Image source: BBC

Additional links:

The Simonyi Professorship: hair for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University

'Poverty' on W2tQ

Sciences care (knowledge) domain links resource

Political care (knowledge) domain links resource

Relative poverty (2) - political

[The introduction is repeated across these posts: intrapersonal, sciences, sociology]

There are many paradoxes in life and many of these are concentrated in the realm of health and medicine (a major sub-division of life and death).

For decades the link between poverty and standards and quality of health has been recognised and politicised in the media and policy. Just this past week was news of a Bill to make the eradication of child poverty a legal obligation not something that can be the political objective at the start of a Government and then cast aside.

Many things are relative and poverty is often described in this way applying to individuals, social classes, communities, regions and whole nations. Using the domains of Hodges' model what reflections does this prompt? Let us see:

POLITICAL: Although we are told that change is happening swathes of humanity face -

poverty of choice or no choice but poverty.

There are those who are able to decide and yet denied choice due to a politics or state that spits explicit corruption denying the people their expressed and collective will. Although previously described as 'black and white' politics must become participative AND must become 'green and (truly) global'. As events in 2009 attest here in the UK, politicians, those key workers / case practitioners in this domain (should paradoxically) disavow personal ambition and at times yet to be decided the party whip system. Yes, these matter, but again space (vacancy) is needed to accommodate - permit and facilitate true focus.

This is no chance opposition of domains in Hodges model.

The diagonal of INTRAPERSONAL and the seat(s) of power and governance
is mediated through the social domain.

Like health professionals, politicians and civil servants must wipe the slate clean: constantly. This is why transparency in politics is so crucial to trust, engagement, and grounded politics. ...

'P' is for politicians not just the 'people'.
Politicians need to be engaged coherently.
Touch is the interface for them too.

A week is a long time in politics because the sun never shines (not even in 'victory'). For these people being open, transparent, non-judgemental ... means their vision is refreshed by a perpetual rain.

Only then will they see poverty and be reminded of it -
even if poverty and even more so if poverty
represents where they came from ...

Image source: Equator Network

Additional links:

Reith Lectures 2009 BBC 'A New Citizenship'

'Poverty' on W2tQ

Political care (knowledge) domain links resource

'Information' a definition

Exactly what information is (at least one very useful technical definition of it) is answered by the mathematical theory of information. A rich field with many applications to biology, linguistics, and electronics, the theory is couched in the language of bits, each bit of information conveying one binary choice. [Hence 5 bits, for example, convey 5 such choices and are sufficient to distinguish from among 32 (or 2⁵) alternatives, there being 32 (2⁵) possible yes-no sequences of length 5.] Bits serve too as units in the numerical measure of such notions as the entropy of information sources, the capacity of communication channels, and the redundancy of messages.

Source: Paulos, J.A., (1991) Binary numbers and codes, Beyond Innumeracy, p.26.

Additional links:

W2tQ 'information'

W2tQ 'Ye Olde paper: 1996 "Humans, information and science'

Bee in my bonnet and a place to call home

For some years (over a decade) I've had a bee in my bonnet about the impact of relative-ly sudden house moves that older adults often make following sudden bereavement.

This prompted a first and no longer maintained website 'Beware Reflex Moves'.

This rather silent issue still stands and is arguably growing in volume.

There are surely a series of studies to be made here. Like most forms of life, the patient-nurse encounters of all those years ago have evolved: the ability of Jo(e) Public and their families to independently visit, select and move their relative into residential care is a new factor.

Self-funding frees up valuable resources as people can essentially circumvent the formal assessment processes of social services (and health), negotiating directly with the home of their choice for a place. This place may be many, many miles away from what was home. Amid increasing demand this arrangement works well much of the time. When it fails though, the impact is a personal and social catastrophe that can also reverberate across two health and social care economies. The person's original social services and their new location - that of their family.

Here the 'diagnosis' may not just be bereavement reaction / depression, but dementia too.

So, the advice remains beware of reflex moves.

Wish those bees had stayed in that bonnet - they might be safe now.....

Image source with thanks: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lelonopo/2378726643/

Relative poverty (1) - intrapersonal

There are many paradoxes in life and many of these are concentrated in the realm of health and medicine (a major sub-division of life and death).

For decades the link between poverty and standards and quality of health has been recognised and politicised in the media and policy. Just this past week was news of a Bill to make the eradication of child poverty a legal obligation not something that can be the political objective at the start of a Government and then cast aside.

Many things are relative and poverty is often described in this way applying to individuals, social classes, communities, regions and whole nations. Using the knowledge domains of Hodges' model what reflections does this prompt? Let us see:

INTRAPERSONAL: On one level highlighting poverty here appears a nonsense as usually we think of material wealth; the ability of people to be able to put decent quality - nourishing food on the table. In the miserable trap that poverty presents, it is perverse to suggest that health and social care workers - indeed all 'customer facing personnel' seek poverty. But they should exercise: poverty of thought.

Health and social care are often couched in terms of being a safety net, especially in community care - this conception emphasizes health and social care as a physical resource. In the intra-interpersonal domain though we are concerned with individual mental life, beliefs, attitudes, thoughts and emotions....

So here it is as if we must adopt the philosophy of Bruce Lee and turn the 'art of fighting without fighting' into the 'art of caring without caring' through a momentary forgetting in order to care effectively. We suspend our thoughts - take a mental breath, bring our training and current evidence to the fore. The conceptual safety net does not work if it comes pre-filled with bias, prejudice, pre-conceived ideas and negative expectations. There is of course a very poignant irony in calling for people to forget, suspend belief - even for an instant - at this time and in this domain. For health and social care workers in wiping the slate clean we do not think, but are VERY receptive to what follows.

This is where the wealth is:
between us.

We should not play the greedy capitalist and keep collaborative tools like Hodges' model to ourselves.

It was made to share: in my mind and yours a global health resource...

Image source: BBC

safety net: http://blogs.jamaicans.com/metinking/2009/04/30/a-jamaican-legacy-that-deserves-our-support/

Additional links: 'Poverty' on W2tQ

Political care (knowledge) domain links resource

COMMENT - 22 June 2009:

Would this article of mine along with its rapid responses add to your discussion?

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/citation/325/7354/51

http://ukpmc.ac.uk/articlerender.cgi?artid=478323 (full text)

Would you like to send me a book chapter on your experiences with the Hodges model in healthcare?

http://www.igi-global.com/requests/details.asp?ID=...

Regards,

Rakesh
Rakesh Biswas

Hello Rakesh,

Many thanks for your input and invitation. I don't think I could make the deadline for the book which is a pity, I've completed two book chapters for IGI thus far. The website is priority and Drupalcon Paris. I will think about this though and e-mail you soon - or please contact me directly at h2cmuk at yahoo.co.uk.
I've another three posts with this title. The post above rather grew to stand alone.
Anyway thanks again your input is most welcome and appreciated.
Regards
Peter

Self-care in e-space and the need to Impress

Working with older adults you realise how unselfish a group they are with regards to their care needs: "spend the money on the children who need it, they are the future."

You also realise that although there are growing numbers of 'silver surfers' (sorry) and their number will swell - the use of digital technology by the general public remains yet another potential source of inequality.

Many years ago I came across HealthSpace (UK) as a fledgling approach and application. I was really impressed as it underlined the need for a generic conceptual framework for health and social care - from senior school through to older age.

It is often said that effective communication needs a channel that is noise free - well here in Hodges' model is a resource to reduce noise for health information across many contexts:

• education
• prevention
• consultation
• social marketing
• self-care
• care planning, evaluation and management
  
• carer support
• supervision

Demographics also underlines the opening remark in this post and for older adults and many younger that matter of choice arises when it comes to the deployment of digital technology. Yes, many forward thinking people will readily jump on board and use ICT to study, learn, commission, record and co-ordinate their own care - or that of a relative. But what about those who will not use HealthSpace or another personal health records [PHRs]?

For those who do not want to engage - are they to be literally pressed into service? Obviously not - and besides recruitment to the UK services is growing. Jokes aside though the pressure to get the public to add value to their own care is critical to the future sustainability of the health and social care system.

Which brings me back to HealthSpace and the following news on e-Health Insider:

'HealthSpace expansion plans shelved'

Last year’s Health Informatics Review outlined a wide-ranging role for HealthSpace, but the DH has now done a U-turn and demanded more evidence of the site’s value to patients before pushing ahead with further expansion.
...
An outline business case worth £80m to £90m – one source puts the figure at £98m - had been developed by CfH, which was to have been submitted to the Treasury earlier this year.

However, the DH is understood to have spiked the business case, seeking more evidence for the value of HealthSpace, which has not received the backing of Christine Connelly, director general of informatics.

Dr Neil Bacon, founder of the doctors’ website doctors.net and the patient website iwantgreatcare.org, said he was unsurprised that the DH had shelved its plans.

“I think this is their way of quietly getting rid of it,” he told EHI Primary Care. “In the commercial world, if a solution with more than 250,000 potential users had only been used by 400 people it would already have been put out of its misery.”

Dr Bacon said he believed there was a clear and growing demand for patients to manage their own health records but that innovative, entrepreneurial solutions rather than government-led solutions would meet that demand.

More to follow no doubt - but do take care even now if you live by the coast ....

Additional links:

Google Health

HealthVault Microsoft

DIY doctors: patients can boost NHS's value, 30 April 2009, HSJ, Paul Corrigan

Digital Britain

The Impress Service

The Royal Navy

Image source: Press Gang stamp

DrupalCamp UK Manchester: education and a (virtual) website

DrupalCamp UK in Manchester this past weekend was a great success. The organisers, sponsors and hosts the BBC on Oxford Road did a magnificent job.

My course through the schedule found me attending:

• Installing and creating your first site
• Drupal for Education
• Drupal and Scrum
• Drupal Forms API
• Introduction to Organic Groups
• Creating your first module
• Using CCK and Views
• The Forms API - again
• Migrating data into Drupal
• Using Photoshop to theme a Drupal site
• Views handlers

All this was really useful, but of particular relevance for me was Robert Castelo and Dominik Lukes's session on Drupal for Education. They discussed key modules and developments in Drupal and also related this to Moodle already well established in the education sector. Modules presented included:

• Biblio
• e-Journal
• WebForm
• Quiz
• Conference

They began with Drupal being applied to education for brochureware (wish the new site was there!). This will be my starting point for Brian Hodges' old notes. These obviously need a place on the site, an archive where they are accessible next to new introductory material written to reflect:

health and social care, public (mental) health
informatics
education
socio-politics and the challenges of the 21st century

Yes I know that is a broad agenda ('too much'), but this is about the learners, learning tools AND the models we teach being fit for purpose...?

Additional links:

Drupal.org

My review on W2tQ of Bill Fitzgerald's book 'Drupal for Education and E-Learning'

Drupal in Education - group

Nursing and Midwifery Council UK: Review of pre-registration nursing education