The best way to explain h2cm is to review the questions Hodges originally posed....
To begin, who are the recipients of care?
Well, first and foremost individuals of all ages, races and creed, but also groups of people, families, communities and populations. In this way the potential scope of Hodges' model is personal and global.
Then Brian Hodges asked: what types of activities - tasks, duties, and treatments - do nurses carry out?
They must always act professionally, but frequently according to strict rules and policies, their actions often dictated by specific treatments including drugs, investigations, and minor surgery. Users who adopt Hodges' model find that the model transcends the purely task-based perspectives of care and intervention. Hodges' model also encompasses beliefs, attitudes, motivation, self-awareness, and values. Nurses do many things by routine according to precise procedures, the stereotypical matron - machine-like efficiency? If these are classed as mechanistic, they contrast with times when healthcare workers give of themselves to reassure, comfort, develop rapport and engage therapeutically. This is opposite to mechanistic tasks and is described as humanistic; what the public usually think of as the caring nurse. In use this framework prompts the user to consider four major subject headings or care domains of knowledge. Namely, what knowledge is needed to care for individuals - groups and undertake humanistic - mechanistic activities?Through these questions Hodges’ derived the model depicted on the website.
Initial study of h2cm on the website has related Hodges’ model to the multicontextual nature of health, informatics, consilience (Wilson, 1998), interdisciplinarity, and visualization. H2cm says nothing about the study of knowledge, but a great deal about the nature of knowledge is implied in the models structure and knowledge domains. This prompted two web pages devoted to the structural and theoretical assumptions of h2cm (Jones, 2000a, b.). Although the axes of h2cm are dichotomous, they also represent continua. This duality is important as for example an individual’s mental health status is situated on a continuum spanning excellent to extremely unwell. There are various states in-between affected by an individual’s beliefs, response to stress, coping strategies, epigenetic and other influences. H2cm was created to meet four educational objectives:
1. To produce a curriculum development tool.
2. Help ensure holistic assessment and evaluation.
3. To support reflective practice.
4. To reduce the theory-practice gap.
Since h2cm’s formulation these objectives have grown in relevance. The 1980s may seem remote, but these problems are far from archaic as expansion of points 1-4 reveals. Education is now preparation for life-long learning. Curricula are under constant pressure. Despite decades of policy declarations, truly holistic care (combining physical, mental and pastoral care) remains elusive. The concept and practice of reflection swings like a metronome, one second seemingly de rigour, the next moment the subject of web based polls. H2cm can be used in interviews, outlining discussion and actions to pursue, an agenda - agreed and shared at the end of a session. The model is equally at home on paper, blackboard, flipchart and interactive whiteboard. Finally, technology is often seen as a way to make knowledge available to all; the means to bridge theory-practice gap through activities such as e-learning, governance and knowledge management. The digital divide cannot be bridged by idealism alone.
The axes within h2cm create a cognitive space; a third axis projecting through the page can represent history; be that an educational, health or other ‘career’. It is ironic, that an act of partition can simultaneously represent reductionism and holism. Reductionism has a pivotal role to play, which h2cm acknowledges in the sciences domain. What h2cm can do is prompt the user that there are three other pages to reflect and write upon.
Should you be interested I can f/w two papers on Hodges' model published 2008 and 2009: please contact me at h2cmng at yahoo.co.uk. Much of the material on the website is in need of update, or removal - if you would like to help please let me know. The time for partnership in spreading Hodges' model is now....
REFERENCES:
Adams, T. (1987). Dementia is a Family Affair. Community Outlook, Feb, pp. 7-8.
Hodges E. Brian (1989). Hodges health Career Model, IN, Hinchcliffe, S.M. (Ed.). Nursing Practice and Health Care, [1st Edition only], London, Edward Arnold.
Jones, P. (1998). Hodges' Health Career Care Domains Model.
Retrieved Feb 20, 2009, from http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk
Jones, P. (2000a). Hodges' Health Career Care Domains Model, Structural Assumptions. Retrieved Feb 20, 2009, from http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/theory.html
Jones, P. (2000b). Hodges' Health Career Care Domains Model, Theoretical Assumptions. Retrieved Feb 20, 2009, from http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/struct.html
Jones, P. (2004a). Viewpoint: Can Informatics And Holistic Multidisciplinary Care Be Harmonised? British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management, 21, 6, 17-18.
Jones, P. (2004b). The Four Care Domains: Situations Worthy of Research. Conference: Building & Bridging Community Networks: Knowledge, Innovation & Diversity through Communication, Brighton, UK.
Wilber, K. (2000). Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy. Shambhala Publications.
Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Abacus.
10 Summary slides from 2006 introductory audio podcast:
http://www.slideshare.net/h2cm/hodges-model-podcast-part-1-summary-slides-2006-presentation/
See the website for references and the blog labels (tags) for additional resources.
